Daniel Farke explains transfer control at Leeds United and sends clear message to 49ers

Daniel Farke has outlined how transfer control works at Leeds United and why there will be no dramatic overhaul of the squad during the January window.

The Leeds boss stressed that cohesion and clarity remain central to his approach, both within the playing group and across the club’s recruitment structure. While Leeds will remain active in the market, Farke made clear that quality and fit will take precedence over volume.

Recent weeks have seen high-profile managerial exits elsewhere in the Premier League, with disputes over recruitment control cited as a recurring theme.

At Manchester United, Ruben Amorim was dismissed following tensions with the board, while Enzo Maresca departed Chelsea amid reported disagreements over long-term strategy.

Leeds, by contrast, operate under a deliberately streamlined model. Data plays a key role, but final decisions are made by a small group of senior figures, with Farke retaining the power to veto any incoming player.

The club’s transfer leadership includes chairman Paraag Marathe, managing director Robbie Evans, sporting director Adam Underwood and head of recruitment Alex Davies — alongside Farke himself.

Leeds’ ownership group, 49ers Enterprises, give the manager autonomy over squad composition, even if he does not work in isolation.

Farke believes clubs are most effective when recruitment responsibility is clearly defined and not overpopulated.

“For me, clubs will be successful when there is just a small amount of people really in charge to give direction,” he said.

“It makes no sense to have 30 people around who all have ideas. Then you are constantly asking too many questions and going in different directions.”

While modern football has moved beyond the one-man model, Farke insists clarity of responsibility is non-negotiable.

“It’s not a one-man show anymore,” he added,

“But you still need clear processes, clear responsibilities, and everyone on the same page.”

Farke reiterated that squad balance is a major factor in his thinking, which explains why Leeds are unlikely to see widespread changes this month.

“The most important thing is that the key people at the club share the same view and go in the same direction,” he said.

“If that’s the case, then you have a chance to be successful. If not, it becomes very difficult.”

Crucially, Leeds will not sign a player against the manager’s wishes. If Farke signals at any point that a deal should be stopped, the process ends.

That structure gives him final say on arrivals, even if targets are identified collaboratively — a balance he believes is healthy.

Leeds are expected to explore one or two additions in January, most likely in attacking areas, but only if the right profile becomes available.

Will Leeds’ streamlined recruitment model give them the edge in January as promotion pressure builds?