Enzo Maresca on the sideline against Bournemouth in 2025

Chelsea transfer latest: Sterling, Disasi and a calm January strategy

Adem Ozcan Last updated: Dec 28, 2025, 6:51 pm
0

Image: Getty Images

Chelsea are set to approach the January transfer window with discipline rather than drama, signalling a clear shift from the club’s recent winter spending sprees.

After the extraordinary January 2023 window — when more than £250m was spent on six players including Enzo Fernández — Chelsea’s recent winter business has been notably restrained. That trend looks set to continue.

According to The Athletic, Chelsea are not planning a busy January, with the focus firmly on summer preparation rather than reactive short-term fixes.

Long-term focus under Maresca and BlueCo

The report underlines a club trying to restore order after years of churn. The squad remains large, expensive, and still evolving under head coach Enzo Maresca, but the priority now is clarity and long-term planning.

Chelsea’s recruitment model does not revolve around a manager’s immediate wish list. While Maresca is consulted and involved, overall strategy is dictated by the sporting leadership group.

That philosophy was evident last summer when Levi Colwill suffered an ACL injury. Maresca requested an additional centre-back but was told the squad had sufficient depth — a decision that reflected Chelsea’s preference for long-term squad balance over short-term reaction.

The same thinking applies this January.

Monitoring targets, but no rush to buy

Chelsea continue to scout widely, but activity remains at the monitoring stage. The Athletic note interest in Rennes defender Jérémy Jacquet and Saint-Étienne forward Djylian N’Guessan, though neither case has progressed beyond observation.

Some potential signings are also being considered with sister club Strasbourg in mind, reinforcing the pathway-driven model under BlueCo ownership.

Certain rumours can be dismissed outright. A return for Thiago Silva was never under consideration, and Chelsea do not feel short of centre-back options.

One clear strategic takeaway, however, concerns midfield.

“In terms of the positions they are concentrating on for the first team in the summer, central midfield has become a priority due to Romeo Lavia’s injury issues,” The Athletic report. The Belgium international has made just 30 appearances since joining from Southampton for £50m in August 2023, a worrying return that has reshaped Chelsea’s long-term planning.

Chelsea also made an initial enquiry for Antoine Semenyo but chose not to pursue a deal — another sign of January restraint.

Outgoings: Sterling and Disasi in focus

While incomings appear unlikely, outgoings are a pressing issue. Chelsea are keen to resolve the futures of Raheem Sterling and Axel Disasi, both of whom are currently excluded from the senior squad.

  • Axel Disasi: A Ligue 1 club has enquired, but Chelsea would prefer either a domestic loan or a permanent move.
  • Raheem Sterling: His situation is more complicated. A £300,000-a-week contract, family ties to London, and a preference for a permanent transfer make any January exit difficult.

Loan flexibility is also limited. Chelsea have already filled their six international loan slots, restricting options. A domestic loan is being explored for Deivid Washington, while Marc Guiu is expected to stay despite limited minutes.

Financial position and PSR clarity

Financially, Chelsea remain comfortable. Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) are not a concern, and while UEFA have issued fines related to squad cost rules, the club is relaxed about compliance.

Crucially, the bulk of Chelsea’s available funds are being held back for the summer, when central midfield reinforcements are expected to be a priority.

The Athletic conclude that Chelsea believe they can still meet their objectives without January signings — even with Colwill absent and Lavia struggling for fitness.

Our view: restraint over reaction

For many Chelsea supporters, this report will feel sensible rather than exciting. After years of frantic January windows that promised solutions but delivered disruption, a quieter approach suggests lessons have been learned.

There will be frustration around Lavia, who many believed would become the heartbeat of midfield. Knowing that central midfield is now a summer priority at least offers reassurance.

Sterling’s situation will divide opinion, while Disasi’s exclusion raises questions about squad management. But clearing space — not adding more bodies — appears to be the priority.

If Chelsea reach the latter stages of the cups and secure Champions League qualification with this group, January restraint will feel justified. Sometimes progress looks like standing still — while quietly preparing for the next decisive move.

0 Comments

First read message

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Football Place